In Defense of “Argument ad Hitlerum”

 

If you’ve visited the internet other than to visit this site, you’ve seen the interaction dozens (or hundreds?) of times by now. One person expresses a view. The view sounds crazy to someone else. The someone else says something to the effect of, “You know who else would have thought that? Hitler.” Or “You know who else did that sort of thing? The Nazis.” Usually, the group moderator or another participant in the dialogue will speak up, turning the argument against the accuser, calling that person out for using “argument ad hitlerum” – that is, reducing the opponent’s view to the sort of thing perpetrated or thought by the Nazis or, in the extreme case, by Hitler himself. The argument is summarily dismissed. And the reason for this dismissal is well intentioned, but I’m here to argue that we ought not to dismiss it so easily.

My point is simple. Most of the atrocities in Nazi Germany (and its wartime territories) were not perpetrated by monsters, though some assuredly were. Millions of average Germans and Nazi sympathizers perpetrated these acts. And, like it or not, modern people are just as average, and are no more immune to blindly following orders or of being led down a primrose path than were Germans in the 1930s and 40s. It is not at all likely that, say, a Texas border-protection militia is going to resort today to liquidation of a sub-population of Mexicans in their state. But we’re engaged in dangerous self-deception if we assume that they (or [insert any other extreme group]) are not capable of getting to that point eventually.

The quick dismissal of any comparison to Nazis is predicated on the assumption that the comparison is being drawn between what someone is doing or thinking now and what was the outcome of Nazi activities before and during the Second World War. But the comparison toward which we ought to be more sympathetic is between the kind of people capable of atrocity and a person doing or thinking something scary today. We sell short the capacity for evil in the hearts and minds of so-thought modern, enlightened people. When someone compares an idea to a Hitler- or Nazi-esque program or way of thinking, we should at least consider the comparison before we dismiss it.

About Steve Capone

Interested in Domestic and Foreign Policy, Ethics, and Political Thought. One-time adjunct instructor and current full-time educator of small humans. Europhile, historophile, & bibliophile. M.S. Philosophy (Univ. of Utah 2013) M.A. Humanities (Univ. of Chicago 2007)
This entry was posted in Ethics and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s